Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 277(7): 2133-2135, 2020 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1049646

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The role of tracheostomy in COVID-19-related ARDS is unknown. Nowadays, there is no clear indication regarding the timing of tracheostomy in these patients. METHODS: We describe our synergic experience between ENT and ICU Departments at University Hospital of Modena underlining some controversial aspects that would be worth discussing tracheostomies in these patients. During the last 2 weeks, we performed 28 tracheostomies on patients with ARDS due to COVID-19 infection who were treated with IMV. RESULTS: No differences between percutaneous and surgical tracheostomy in terms of timing and no case of team virus infection. CONCLUSION: In our experience, tracheostomy should be performed only in selected patients within 7- and 14-day orotracheal intubation.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Intubation, Intratracheal , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/methods , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/therapy , Tracheostomy/methods , Adult , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics/prevention & control , Patient Care Team , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/etiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Treatment Outcome
2.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 278(3): 847-848, 2021 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-813333
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL